Oregon Intellectual Property Newsletter

Intellectual Property Students Organization

The Oregon Intellectual Property Newsletter (OIPN) is produced by the students of the Lewis and Clark Law School and sponsored by the Intellectual Property Section of the Oregon State Bar. OIPN is published twice a year, consists of articles and case summaries written by both practicing attorneys and law students, and is sent to the members of the Intellectual Property Section of the Oregon State Bar.

Editor-in-Chief:	Adrian Sherrill

Submissions Editor:	Milos Bosnac	Lay-Ping Tan

Form & Style Editors:	Jon S Hale Ryan Lu	Evalani Pandaraoan

Notes & Comment Editors	Carey Caldwell	Colleen Shovlin

Web Editor	Charan Saini

Text Editors:	Brooklyn Baggett Vicky Bajwa Dave Bourgeau Michael Cleary Casey Cox Nicolo Davidson	Blake Fry Delfina Homen Suk Min Kim Uyen Nguyen David Tayler Vanessa Yaziciqil

Former Text Editors	Bryan Beel Deneil Bragg Jen Coates Conroy Tommy Henson Melanie Kebler Michael Nelson Joseph Pitt Kerry Snyder	Milos Bosanac Yoonhee Chang Richard Dyer Stephen James Colin Lebens Sarah Peterson Anya Ronshaugen Ann Trader

Instructions for editors (enter your email information at the prompt)

2008

Volume 10, Number 1 - Fall 2008
Statutory Uncertainty at Both Ends of a Copyright Infringement Case

Developments in the Extra-Territorial Enforcement of U.S. Patents

Honorable Pierre Leval as Distinguished IP Visitor

Cartoon Network LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.

United States v. Whitehead

Board of Regents, U. of Texas ex. rel. U. of Texas at Austin v. KST Electric, LTD

Jacobsen v. Katzer

Volume 9, Number 1 - Spring 2008
Key Word Advertising Using Tradmarked Terms: Fair or Foul?

Sitrick v. Dreamworks, LLC

Doe v. Geller

Halliburton Energy Services v. M-I LLC

Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. Haute Diggity Dog, LLC

Riviera Distributors, Inc. v. Jones

2007

Volume 8, Number 2 - Winter 2007

Volume 8, Number 1 – Summer 2007
Re-Thinking the Admissibility of Non-Prior Art as Evidence of the Level of Skill in the Art to Support an Obviousness Defense in Patent Litigation

The Effect of MedImmune on Using the Declaratory Judgment Act to Challenge a Licensed Patent

From the President of IPSO

Patent Claim Construction: The
Neglected Preamble

Letter From the Editor

Kahle v. Gonzales

2006

Volume 7, Number 2 - Winter 2006
Open Source In Practice: From Idea To Market To Your Desk

Bringing FOSS Into The Enterprise: Thoughts On "Best Practices"

Open Source in M&A and Other Transactions

Implied Patent Rights and Open Source Software

Harald Welte, Linux, and the GPL

Semi-Open Source: The Case for Hybrid Licensing

Trademark Enforcement for National Brands Made Easier – Not So For Others: Significant Changes to Trademark Dilution Act Signed into Law

Volume 7, Number 1 – Spring 2006
Letter From the President

Preserving the Exculpatory Value of an Opinion Letter

Field v. Google, Inc

Is Something Amiss? A Commentary on the Aftermath of
Phillips v. AWH Corp

Contractual Restrictions on Paired Patented Goods

IPXL Holdings, L.L.C. v. Amazon.com, Inc.

2005

Volume 6, Number 2 – Fall 2005
Davidson & Associates v. Jung

The Revival of the Prosecution Laches

Defense Against Patent Infringement: Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Lemelson
Medical, Education & Research
Foundation, L.P.

Open Source Software— Pandemic or Panacea?

Claim Indefiniteness in Two Patent Infringement Suits: Datamize, LLC v. Plumtree Software, Inc. and Marley Mouldings Limited v. Mikron Industries, Inc.

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Google, Inc.

Volume 6, Number 1 – Spring 2005
This Land Belongs to All of Us

Sarbanes-Oxley Act – The IP Audit & Strategy Development Process

C.R.E.A.T.E. Act Provides a Safe Harbor for Joint Research Projects

Grupo Gigante S.A. de C.V. v. Dallo & Co.

Star Fruits S.N.C. and Institute of Experimental Botany v. United States and Department of Commerce

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

2004

Volume 5, Number 2 – Fall 2004
Sixth Circuit Abolishes De Minimis Use Doctrine for Sound Recording Copyright Infringement: A Note on Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films

From the President of IPSO

From the Editor

TRIPS, Doha and Pharmaceuticals

In re Wilhem Elsner

Knorr-Bremse Systeme v. Dana Corp.

In re Alberto Lee Bigio

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster Ltd.

Volume 5, Number 1 – Spring 2004
Of Teapots and Cool Coffee Cups: Exploring the Possibilities of Copyright Protection for Useful Objects and Industrial Designs

Letter From the Chairperson

From the President of IPSO

From the Editor

When IPR Meets PGR in Oregon Agriculture

Ellison v. Robertson and AOL

Golight v. Wal-Mart

Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions

Anthony J. DeGidio v. West Group Corporation; The Thomson Corporation; West Licensing Corporation

2003
Volume 4, Number 2 – Winter 2003	Volume 4, Number 1 – Spring 2003

2002
Volume 3, Number 2 – Fall 2002	Volume 3, Number 1 – Spring 2002

2001
Volume 2, Number 2 – Fall 2001	Volume 2, Number 1 – Spring 2001

2000
Volume 1, Number 2 – Fall 2000	Volume 1, Number 1 – Spring 2000

1999
Fall 1999

Contact Us

The Intellectual Property Sudents Organizations is located in Law School.

Email ipso@lclark.edu

President Nicolo Davidson

Intellectual Property Students Organization