Volume
25, Issue 3
Summer 1995
ARTICLE
Toxic Apportionment: A Causation and Risk Contribution
Model
Gerald W. Boston
Professor Boston urges
application of principles of apportionment to those toxic tort cases involving
multiple sources of toxic-related risks and suggests that a risk contribution
model that compares the toxic-related risks each entity created and contributed
to the resultant harm can function as a means for apportioning that harm. In
advocating this model, Professor Boston relies on case examples from asbestos,
multiple-defendant real property, and hazardous waste cleanup contexts as well
as principles contained in the Restatement (Second) of Torts.
ESSAY
Running on Empty: The Case for a Sustainable National
Transportation System
F. Kaid Benfield
Mr. Benfield, senior attorney and
Director of the Transportation Project at the Natural Resources Defense Coucil
in Washington, D.C., explores the federal Department of Transportation's
upcoming creation of a national transportation system, which will address
environmental concerns and restructure the federal administration of
transportation. He concludes by suggesting a number of policy directions to
make the new system sustainable.
SYMPOSIUM: PRESIDENT CLINTON'S NEW LAND POLICIES
On January 5, 1995, the Natural
Resources Law Section of the Association of American Law Schools convened a
panel of experts to review the first two years on the Clinton Administration's
natural resources policy. Participants in the conference included several law
professors, the executive director of a major policy analysis institute, and
the Solicitor of the United States Department of Interior. These Articles are
adaptations of remarks delivered at the Symposium.
Introductory Remarks
Dean James L. Huffman
Natural Resources Policy in the Clinton Administration: A
Mid-Course Evaluation from Inside
John D. Leshy
Mr. Leshy is the Solicitor of the
United States Department of Interior. His essay traces several basic themes in
DOI natural resources policy under the Clinton Administration, including more
respect for science, federalism, and tribal interest and more willingness to "re-invent"
government.
Reflection on the Endangered Species Act
Oliver A. Houck
Professor Houck reflects on the
purposes and effects of the Endangered Species Act by focusing on what he
believes to be the premise of the Act--habitat protection. He then searches for
answers to why the Act and its approach to habitiat protection has become one
of the most controversial provisons in environmental law.
'Til the Cows Come Home: The Fatal Flaw in the Clinton
Administration's Public Lands Grazing Policy
Joseph M. Feller
Professor Feller evaluates the
Clinton Administration's efforts to reform environmentally destructive
livestock grazing on public lands in the western United States. He concludes
that although the Administration has issued a number of regulatory proposals
exhibiting varying degrees of commitment to genuine change, the proposals still
perpetuate fundamental flaws in the grazing system causing environmental
destruction.
Energy Policy from Nixon to Clinton: From Grand Provider
to Market Facilitator
Alan S. Miller
Professor Miller, the Executive
Director of the Center for Global Change, provides a history of U.S. energy
policy, documents present developments in energy consumption and technology,
and suggests that the U.S. might do well to adopt the more aggressive national
energy policies of other industrialized nations.
Fulfilling the Executive's Trust Responsibilty Toward the
Native Nations on Environmental Issues: A Partial Critique of the Clinton
Administration's Promises and Performance
Mary Christina Wood
Professor Wood analyzes the
Clinton Administration's emerging policies to accomodate native interests when
implementing environmental and natural resources statutes. She focuses in
particular on the trust responsibility in implementing the Endangered Species
Act, drawing upon recent regulatory actions affecting treaty fishing in the
Columbia River basin to demonstrate the need for prioritizing tribal interests
when regulatory action affects treaty rights.
COMMENT
Mootness and Citizen Suit Civil Penalty Claims Under the
Clean Water Act: A Post-Lujan Reassessment
Matthew M. Werner
Mr. Werner surveys the cases that
have followed the Supreme Court's decision in Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd.
v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. regarding their relationship between
mootness doctrine and citizen suits under the Clean Water Act. He concludes
that the holding of the majority of these cases--that injunctive claims can
become moot while civil penalty claims cannot--is no longer valid in light of
the Supreme Court's decision in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife.
1994 NINTH CIRCUIT
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Legal Status of Land and Resource Management Plans of
the National Forests: Paying the Price for Statutory Ambiguity
John P. Hogan
Mr. Hogan contemplates the
differing court interpretations of the role that Land and Resource Management
Plans play in national forest planning and contends that these plans should be
viewed as meaningful and concrete decisions that predetermine future agency
actions and, as such, should be subject to judicial review.
Alaska Sport Fishing Association v. Exxon Corporation
Highlights the Need to Take a Hard Look at the Doctrine of Parens Patriae
When Applied in Natural Resource Damage Litigation
Scott Kerin
Mr. Kerin investigates the broad
interpretations of the doctrine of parens patriae that courts are
applying in the context of natural resource damage litigation. Observing that
such expansive readings pose significant risks to individual litigants, he
concludes that the doctrine must be re-examined.
Transportation Planning and the Clean Air Act
Alan L. Mitchell
Mr. Mitchell examines the Clean Air Act's requirement that states submit implementation plans for reducing air pollution, reviews the Ninth Circuit's holding in Trustees for Alaska v. Fink which suggests lack of funding may excuse enforcement of a state's plan, and argues against such an excuse.