Estate and Gift Taxation

Fall 2008

Bogdanski

 

 

FINAL EXAMINATION

(Three hours)

 

INSTRUCTIONS

 

            This examination consists of three essay questions, each of which will be given equal weight in determining grades.  Three hours will be permitted for this examination.  At the end of the three hours, you must turn in both this set of questions and your answers to them in the original envelope in which this set came.

 

            All answers must be entered on an approved type of computer disk or on separate sheets of plain white paper (or for those writing answers by hand, in the bluebooks you have been provided­).  No credit will be given for anything written on this set of questions.

 

            Pay close attention to the final portion, or “call,” of each question.  Failure to respond to the matters called for will result in a low score for the question.  On the other hand, discussion of matters outside the scope of the call of the question will not receive credit.

 

            Be sure to explain as thoroughly as possible your answers to the questions posed.  Your reasoning, discussion, and analysis are often as important as any particular conclusion you reach.

 

            The suggested time limit for each question is one hour.  Experience has shown that failure to budget one's time according to this limit can result in a drastic lowering of one's overall grade on this examination.

 

            References to “the Code” mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  For purposes of this examination, assume that:

 

           at all times, the interest rate described in section 7520(a) of the Code is 7.0 percent per annum,

 

           all individuals described in the ques­tions are U.S. citizens and U.S. residents; and

 

           the federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping-transfer taxes do not expire in 2010; the current laws relating to those taxes for transactions and events occurring in 2008 are made permanent and remain in effect throughout all of the transactions and events described in these questions.

 



QUESTION ONE

(One hour)

 

            On July 15, 2007, Mildred, who has been divorced and single for many years, establishes an irrevocable trust, of which she appoints her attorney the trustee.  Under the terms of the trust, the income from the trust is to be paid to Mildred or her estate annually for 25 years.  At the end of the 25 years, the trust is to terminate, and all of the assets of the trust are to be distributed to Mildred’s adult son, Shane.

 

            Mildred retains the right to invade any and all of the corpus of the trust at any time, with the consent of the trustee, for Mildred’s own “health, comfort, or well-being,” or for the benefit of Mildred’s other adult son, Oscar.  The corpus of the trust consists of publicly traded stocks and bonds, including 1,000,000 shares of the common stock of one corpora­tion, Pubco.  This is the largest block of Pubco stock owned by any one shareholder, but it does not possess control over Pubco or its management.

 

            On June 1, 2008, Mildred amends the trust, renouncing her rights to invade the corpus for herself or for Oscar – rights that she never exercised.  She retains her income interest.

 

            On August 22, 2010, Mildred suddenly dies, survived by Shane and Oscar.  In her will, she leaves her remaining income interest in the trust to Oscar.  The rest of her estate, which is substantial, is divided between Shane and Oscar.

 

            The personal representative of Mildred’s estate spends substantial sums of the estate’s money on the following: brokers’ commissions for selling off Mildred’s real estate; estate taxes imposed by Mildred’s home state; and attorney’s fees.  Part of the attorney’s fees are for defending a highly publicized defamation claim that had been made against Mildred shortly before she died; after several months of court-supervised discovery in a lawsuit over the claim, the estate pays the plaintiff a small sum of money to settle the case.

 

            What are the federal gift, estate, and generation-skipping-transfer tax consequences to   Mildred and Mildred’s estate of each of the transac­tions and events just dis­cussed, with and without all available tax elections?  Be sure to discuss the amount and timing of each item.

 

            Discuss.

 

(End of Question 1)

 

 


QUESTION TWO

(One hour)

 

            Wendy and Henry are wife and husband.  They are quite wealthy, and they frequently make gifts to various members of their family.  In year 1, Wendy establishes an irrevocable trust, placing in it a stock portfolio with a fair market value of $3,500,000.

 

            The trust instrument names Wendy’s sister, Sarah, as trustee.  Under the terms of the trust, all of the income from the trust is to be distributed annually to Henry for the rest of his life.  The trust also gives Henry a power to appoint by will the entire trust corpus to his estate or his creditors.  If Henry does not exercise this testamentary power, the trust corpus is to be distributed at his death to the nonprofit church that the couple attends.  The trust documents also require Sarah to pay out the income or the corpus of the trust to the extent necessary for (a) the support of Brent, age 11, who is Wendy and Henry’s son, or (b) the education and medical care of Gwen, age 2, who is Wendy and Henry’s granddaughter.  (Gwen’s mother is Peggy, who is Wendy and Henry’s oldest daughter.)

 

            In year 3, Sarah, acting as trustee, makes a $120,000 distribution to Gwen.  Peggy, acting as custodian under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, deposits the $120,000 check into Gwen’s custodial bank account.  Shortly thereafter, Peggy writes a check drawn on that account to pay $120,000 for extraordinary medical care that Gwen needs.

 

            In year 4, Wendy dies.  At the time of her death, the trust corpus has a fair market value of $4,250,000.

 

            In year 10, Henry dies, survived by Sarah, Peggy, and Gwen.  At the time of Henry’s death, the trust corpus has a fair market value of $5,500,000.  Henry does not appoint the trust corpus to anyone in his will, and so Sarah, in her capacity as trustee, distributes the corpus to the church.

 

            What are the federal gift, estate, and generation-skipping-transfer tax consequences – to Wendy, Henry, their respective estates, and Sarah – of each of the transac­tions and events just dis­cussed, with and without all available tax elections?  Be sure to discuss the amount and timing of each item.

 

            Explain.

 

(End of Question 2)

 

 


QUESTION THREE

(One hour)

 

            In 2008, Frank, a single widower who has previously used up all of his gift tax unified credit, gives his daughter, Darla, an undivided one-half interest in a an apartment complex that Frank owns.  The undivided interest is as a tenant in common with Frank, without right of survivorship.  On the date of the gift, the apartment complex has a fair market value of $1,800,000.  Frank owns it free and clear of any mortgages or other encumbrances.

 

            Also in 2008, Frank and Darla form a family investment partnership, which they have named Famco.  Most of the initial assets of Famco are contributed to it by Frank.  Famco is a general partnership, and Frank and Darla are equal partners; they have equal management and economic rights in the firm.  Under the Famco partnership agreement, when either of the partners dies, the surviving partner has the option to purchase the deceased partner’s interest for that interest’s pro rata share of the book value of Famco on the date of the deceased partner’s death.

 

            In 2011, Frank dies, survived by Darla.  At the time of Frank’s death, the book value of Famco is $2,000,000, of which Frank’s pro rata share is $1,000,000.  At that time, the fair market value of Famco assets is $10,000,000, and it has liabilities of $2,000,000.  Thus, the net fair market value of its assets is $8,000,000, of which Frank’s pro rata share would be $4,000,000.

 

            Frank leaves his entire estate to Darla.  One of the items in the estate is Frank’s account in a retirement fund established at his place of employment.  Frank died before becoming eligible to receive any benefits from the account.  Upon his death, the fund commences making monthly payments to Darla for the rest of her life.

 

            What are the federal gift, estate, and generation-skipping-transfer tax consequences to Frank and Frank’s estate of each of the transac­tions and events just dis­cussed, with and without all available tax elections?  Be sure to discuss the amount and timing of each item.

           

            Discuss.

 

(End of examination)

 

Created by:  bojack@lclark.edu

Update:  18 Jan 09

Expires:  31 Aug 09