Income Taxation I
Fall 2003
Bogdanski
FINAL EXAMINATION -- PART TWO
(Two hours)
INSTRUCTIONS
This
second part of the examination consists of two essay questions, each of which
will be given equal weight in determining grades. Two hours will be permitted for this part. At the end of the two hours, you must turn
in both this set of essay questions and your answers in the original envelope
in which this set came.
All
answers must be entered in the bluebooks you have been provided (or, for those
typing or operating computers, on separate sheets of plain white paper or a
computer floppy disk). No credit will
be given for anything written on this set of questions.
Pay
close attention to the final portion, or "call," of each
question. Failure to respond to the
matters called for will result in a low score for the question. On the other hand, discussion of matters
outside the scope of the call of the question will not receive credit.
Be sure
to explain as thoroughly as possible your answers to the questions posed. Your reasoning, discussion, and analysis are
often as important as any particular conclusion you reach.
The
suggested time limit for each question is one hour. Experience has shown that failure to budget one's time according
to this limit can result in a drastic lowering of one's overall grade on this
examination.
Unless
otherwise expressly instructed, assume that all taxpayers described in the questions
are individuals, and that they report their income on the cash method and the
calendar year for federal income tax purposes. Any references to the "Code" mean the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.
QUESTION ONE
(One hour)
Emma is
employed as a manager by a corporation named Company. Company's stock is actively traded on a national stock
exchange. On February 1, 2003, Company
transfers 10,000 shares of its stock to Emma in recognition of "the love
that Company's customers and co-workers have for you." On the date of the transfer, Company stock
is trading on the stock exchange at a price of $15 a share.
Unlike
the shares traded on the market, however, the shares transferred to Emma are
subject to two conditions specified in the stock transfer documents. First, if Emma leaves Company's employ before
February 1, 2004, she is required to surrender the 10,000* shares back to
Company for no consideration. Second,
prior to February 1, 2005, Emma is prohibited from selling or otherwise
transferring the shares to anyone other than an employee of Company.
Emma
continues working for Company through 2005.
On February 1, 2004, the price of Company stock on the exchange is $18 a
share. On February 1, 2005, the price
of Company stock on the exchange is $13 a share. On July 1, 2005, Emma sells her 10,000 shares to her ex-husband,
Harry, for $10 a share, which is the prevailing market price for the stock on
that date.
Emma
borrows $175,000 from a bank and uses the loan proceeds, along with the
$100,000 stock sale proceeds, to buy residential rental property. Here is how the $275,000 is spent: Emma pays
the seller of the property $200,000 cash, and her real estate agent a $10,000
cash commission. Shortly thereafter, Emma spends $15,000 to make a
number of overdue repairs to the property; and another $50,000 to make
long-range improvements to the property.
Emma then rents the property out to strangers at a market rent. She is able to make all her payments of
principal and interest on the bank loan out of the rents.
What
are the federal income tax consequences to Emma of each of the transactions
just described, with and without all available elections? Be sure to discuss the amount, timing, and
character (ordinary or capital) of each item of income, gain, deduction, loss,
or credit, and Emma's basis in her assets, at each stage of the transactions
discussed.
Discuss.
(End of Question 1)
* In
the actual exam, there was a typographical error, and "1,000"
appeared here, while "10,000" was intended. – JB
QUESTION TWO
(One hour)
Heather
and Bob have lived together as a couple for several years, but they are not
married and they have no children.
Heather is a hotel worker who earns an annual salary of around $40,000. Bob is a self-employed software developer
whose business generates an annual profit of around $32,000. Both have ambitions to increase their income
greatly in future years. For now,
Heather and Bob rent their house from a landlord. Neither Heather nor Bob itemizes his or her deductions for
federal income tax purposes. The two of
them come to you, a tax lawyer, and ask you what the federal income tax
consequences would be of their getting married and buying a home.
On her
birthday, Bob gives Heather an antique fur coat that Bob received as a bequest
in the will of his late grandmother.
The grandmother had purchased the coat when it was new for $50; when she
died, it was worth $100. (The
grandmother was not wealthy, and her estate paid no estate taxes.) Heather does not like the coat, but she
finds a buyer who likes it a great deal.
The buyer pays Heather $225 for the coat.
Bob is
still paying interest on his educational loans from his days as an
undergraduate college student. In 2003,
he pays interest of $4,000 on the student loans, which are not secured by a mortgage
or security interest on any property.
Also in
2003, Bob purchases about $8,000 worth of equipment and $2,000 worth of
supplies for use in his business. He
pays state sales taxes of $700 on these items.
What
are the federal income tax consequences to Heather and Bob of each of the
transactions just described, with and without all available elections? Be sure to discuss the amount, timing, and
character (ordinary or capital) of each item of income, gain, deduction, loss,
or credit, and Heather's and Bob's basis in their assets, at each stage of the
transactions discussed.
Explain.
(End of examination)