Income Taxation I

Fall 2010

Bogdanski

 

 

FINAL EXAMINATION – PART TWO

(Two hours)

 

INSTRUCTIONS

 

            This second part of the examination consists of two essay questions, each of which will be given equal weight in determin­ing grades.  Two hours will be permitted for this part.  At the end of the two hours, you must turn in both this set of essay questions and your answers, in the original envelope in which this set came.

 

            All answers must be entered on an approved type of computer disk or on separate sheets of plain white paper (or for those writing answers by hand, in the bluebooks you have been provided­).  No credit will be given for anything written on this set of questions.

 

            Pay close attention to the final portion, or “call,” of each question.  Failure to respond to the matters called for will result in a low score for the question.  On the other hand, discussion of matters outside the scope of the call of the question will not receive credit.

 

            Be sure to explain as thoroughly as possible your answers to the questions posed.  Your reasoning, discussion, and analysis are often as important as any particular conclusion you reach.

 

            The suggested time limit for each question is one hour.  Experience has shown that failure to budget one's time according to this limit can result in a drastic lowering of one's overall grade on this examination.

 

            Unless otherwise expressly instructed, assume that all taxpayers described in the ques­tions are individuals, and that they report their income on the cash method and the calendar year for federal income tax pur­poses.  Any references to the “Code” mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 


QUESTION ONE

(One hour)

 

            Carly, a self-employed physician, specializes in performing cosmetic surgery.  Most of her clients are aging “baby boomers” who come to her for various procedures to make them look more youthful.  Carly attends a one-day seminar entitled “Manage Your Time, Your Money, and Your Life for Greater Success and Happiness.”  She pays tuition for the event of $500.

 

            At the seminar, she strikes up a conversation with another physician, Duncan.  Duncan asks Carly if Duncan can borrow a piece of laser equipment that Carly owns and uses in her practice.  The equipment cost Carly $120,000 when she purchased it two years ago for cash; Carly made a valid election under Section 179 of the Code as to the equipment in that year.  Carly agrees to let Duncan borrow the equipment for a short time in exchange for future patient referrals.

 

            Several weeks after Duncan begins using Carly’s laser, Carly calls Duncan to ask for its return.  Duncan does not answer Carly’s phone calls and e-mail messages, nor does Duncan respond to a letter from Carly’s attorney, Bernie, demanding the equipment’s return.

 

            After two months of this, Carly sues Duncan in state court, alleging conversion of the equipment, breach of contract, and unfair competition.  In the lawsuit, Carly seeks $120,000 damages for the converted equipment, $40,000 in lost profits, and $500,000 in punitive damages.  Following protracted settlement talks, Duncan pays Carly $135,000 cash to settle all of Carly’s claims.  Carly pays Bernie a $25,000 fee for representing her in the dispute.

 

            Shortly after receiving the settlement check from Duncan, Carly purchases a new, improved model of the laser equipment for $200,000.  She pays an equipment broker a $5,000 fee for finding her a manufacturer who can provide expedited shipment of the laser.  She immediately puts the new laser to use in her medical practice.

 

            What are the federal income tax consequences to Carly of all the transactions just discussed, with and without any available elections?  Be sure to discuss the amount, timing, and character (ordinary or capital) of each item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit, and the basis of Carly’s property, at each stage of the transactions.

 

            Explain.

 

(End of Question 1)

 



QUESTION TWO

(One hour)

 

            Jenny, a single woman, lives with her mother, Marie, in a home that Jenny owns.  Marie is retired, and Marie’s only sources of income are her qualified retirement plan account and government Social Security benefits; the Social Security benefits are not taxable under the Code.  Marie has gross income of $4,800 a year, all from the qualified retirement plan.  Jenny provides slightly more than half of Marie’s support for the year.

 

            Marie gives Jenny the engagement ring that Marie’s late husband, Floyd, had transferred to her just before they were married.  Floyd had inherited the ring from his grandmother, Gail, when Gail died decades ago.  When Gail died, the ring had a fair market value of $800; when Floyd transferred it to Marie, it had a fair market value of $1,200; and when Marie gives it to Jenny, it has a fair market value of $2,000.  Fifteen months after Marie gives it to Jenny, Jenny sells the ring to a stranger for $1,850 cash.

 

            Jenny’s son, Scott, is 16 years old and a full-time student away at a boarding school in another state.  Scott lives with Jenny during the summers and during school breaks, but he receives most of his support from his father, Jenny’s ex-husband, Oscar.  Scott visits Oscar occasionally but rarely stays overnight at Oscar’s residence.

 

            Jenny’s brother, Brook, establishes an irrevocable trust for the benefit of Jenny and Scott.  Brook transfers to the trust a valuable corporate bond; it has a fair market value of $100,000 and a basis in Brook’s hands of $90,000 immediately before the transfer.  The terms of the trust call for the income from the bond to be paid annually to Jenny until her death; at that point, the trust is to terminate and the assets in the trust are to be distributed to Scott.  The trustee, a bank, is given the power to distribute income to Scott instead of Jenny if Scott needs money for his education.  Since Scott has ample funds from Oscar, however, the bank never exercises this power.  Every year, the bank distributes the income of the trust to Jenny, as the trust documents require.

 

            In October, Jenny wins a large prize in a state lottery.  The winning numbers are an­nounced on the internet.  Under the lottery’s rules, payments are made to the winner in cash 30 days after the winner appears at lottery headquarters and surrenders the winning ticket to claim the prize.  After conferring with her accountant, Jenny waits until December 15 to turn in her winning ticket.  The prize is paid to her in cash on January 14 of the following year.

 

            What are the federal income tax consequences to Jenny of all the transactions just discussed, with and without any available elections?  Be sure to discuss the amount, timing, and character (ordinary or capital) of each item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit; and the basis of Jenny’s property, at each stage of the transactions.

 

            Discuss.

(End of examination)

 

Created by: bojack@lclark.edu
Update:  18 Jan 11
Expires:  31 Aug 11