Put the Web to Work for
You and Your Students!

Michael Krauss, Lewis & Clark College

---

Evaluation of Faculty and Workshop

 

This is an anonymous evaluation.

Workshop Name:
Instructor:
Date:

A. Faculty Member

1. Knowledge of subject. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

2. Appropriate use of workshop time. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

3. Effective use of workshop materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

4. Skill in facilitating discussion and participation. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

5. Respectful of participants. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

6. Encouragement for participants to think for themselves. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

7. Approachability. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

8. Presentation style. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

9. Use of technology in presentation 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

10. Overall effectiveness 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

B. Workshop

1. Quality of materials. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

2. Appropriate attention to theory. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

3. Appropriate attention to practice. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

4. Relevance to professional development. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

5. Overall rating of workshop. 1 2 3 4 5 Does not apply

Comments on the faculty member: Strengths and weaknesses?
Suggestions for improving his/her teaching?

Comments on the workshop: Strengths and weakness in content and organization?
How has the workshop contributed to your professional knowledge and skill development?

Return to Workshop Home Page.

Created by: krauss@lclark.edu
Updated: 8/19/02