Integrating Technology Across the Curriculum: Internet/Computer Writing Resources for a Content-Based Curriculum, Michael Krauss, ISALC, Lewis & Clark College


Core 411, Michael Krauss

PEER REVIEW- ARGUMENTATION

Writer's Name __________________ Reviewer's Name _______________

1. Does the writer catch your attention at the beginning? (quote? question? interesting fact?, etc.) Explain.


2. Does the writer establish "ethos" at the beginning? Does she stress that she and the reader are in similar situations or have similar values, interests or beliefs? Does the writer let the reader know that she is qualified to give an opinion on the topic? (either that she has personal knowledge or experience with the topic, or that she has done research on the topic) Explain.




3. Does the introduction end with a clear "thesis statement?" What is the thesis of the paper?



4. Does the writer make logical arguments (logos)? Does she give support with details and examples? or give citations to other sources? Explain.





5. Does the writer have a separate section to discuss counter arguments that the reader may make? Does she logically and effectively respond to these counter arguments, using phrases such as "although it may be true that. . .," or "while it is certainly true that. . .". Explain.



6. Has the writer appealed to the emotion of the reader? (Pathos). If so, do you think use of pathos is appropriate and effective for this topic? Explain.



7. Does the conclusion of the paper effectively bring the argument to a close? Does the writer ask the reader to take specific action or to at least consider her arguments carefully? Explain.




8. What is the best part of this paper? What part is the weakest? Explain.

 

Return to top.


Return to Internet/Computer Writing Resources home page.

Created by: krauss@lclark.edu
Updated: 3/14/98